<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Closed | NIHR SRMRC - Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.srmrc.nihr.ac.uk/trial_category/closed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.srmrc.nihr.ac.uk</link>
	<description>Improving trauma care and outcomes for patients through translational research built on military, NHS and scientific partnership</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 11:49:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>RED DIAMOND</title>
		<link>https://www.srmrc.nihr.ac.uk/trials/red-diamond/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[webteam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 15:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://srmrc.nihr.ac.uk/?post_type=trial&#038;p=10077</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When people suffer a brain injury, currently the only way in which we can directly monitor the brain tissue in terms of pressure and oxygen delivery is by the insertion...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When people suffer a brain injury, currently the only way in which we can directly monitor the brain tissue in terms of pressure and oxygen delivery is by the insertion of probes into the skull and brain tissue itself. Not only is this obviously invasive but it confines detailed brain tissue monitoring to the intensive care unit.</p>
<p>Near Infra Red Light has fascinating properties in that it can pass through biological tissue and be used to identify hemoglobin, and how much oxygen is attached to the haemoglobin within tissues. This technology at the moment is used frequently to monitor the levels of oxygen in the blood via a finger probe giving an indication of lung function.</p>
<p>Although the technology is currently available to monitor brain oxygen levels using infra red light (or near infra red light) it has up until now not been considered sufficiently accurate to be used in traumatic brain injury. We are developing a refined and improved method of non-invasively monitoring the brain using these techniques. With your help we aim to develop a system that is sufficiently accurate that it can be used in brain trauma, in some cases replacing invasive probes, and hopefully this system can be used in many different areas of care outside of the intensive care unit. All of these will provide a real benefit to individuals who suffer brain injury in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>ALLEGRO</title>
		<link>https://www.srmrc.nihr.ac.uk/trials/allegro-2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[webteam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 14:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://srmrc.nihr.ac.uk/?post_type=trial&#038;p=10070</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Update August 2021 &#8211; ALLEGRO has now closed to recruitment at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital A common problem in about 40% of patients having bowel surgery is that their bowel...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Update August 2021</strong> &#8211; ALLEGRO has now closed to recruitment at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital</p>
<p>A common problem in about 40% of patients having bowel surgery is that their bowel takes longer than normal to start working again. In most patients the bowel will start working after surgery in 3- 4 days, but in some it takes a week or more. We call this &#8220;delayed recovery of gut function&#8221;.  This delayed recovery causes nausea, vomiting, complete constipation, tummy pain and tummy swelling (distension). As a result, patients cannot eat or drink until gut function returns, their recovery is slower and they have to stay longer in hospital. There is no immediate cure, and although it gets better on its own in most cases, it can take from 3-7 days to do so. During this time patients have to have a continuous intravenous drip and often insertion of a nasogastric tube to empty the stomach to reduce vomiting (most patients find this very unpleasant).</p>
<p><strong> </strong>One of the common drugs used in hospitals is the local anaesthetic: Lidocaine. This is used to “freeze” parts of the body, for example for minor skin operations or dental procedures. Recently Lidocaine has been used intravenously (through the vein) as part of a general anaesthetic. It reduces pain and inflammation caused by surgery, and seems to help other aspects of recovery that may be important for return of gut function, for example reducing nausea and vomiting, and shortening the time from surgery to first bowel movement. However, previous studies were small and the true benefit of Intravenous (IV) Lidocaine is uncertain. We hope to find out if giving IV Lidocaine improves recovery of gut function after colorectal surgery for NHS patients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>BLING-III</title>
		<link>https://www.srmrc.nihr.ac.uk/trials/bling-iii/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[webteam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2020 14:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://srmrc.nihr.ac.uk/?post_type=trial&#038;p=10066</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This study is comparing two administration methods for beta-lactam antibiotics: continuous infusion, given continuously over 24 hours, or intermittent infusion, given at regular intervals over 24 hours. The purpose of...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This study is comparing two administration methods for beta-lactam antibiotics: continuous infusion, given continuously over 24 hours, or intermittent infusion, given at regular intervals over 24 hours. The purpose of this study is to determine whether seriously ill adults with severe infection who receive a beta-lactam antibiotic via continuous IV infusion compared with intermittent IV infusion (for 30 minutes every 6 or 8 or 12 hours) will have an improved outcome 90 days later. This study will allow doctors to make informed decisions about the best administration method for beta-lactam antibiotics.</p>
<p>Beta-lactam antibiotics are a group of antibiotics commonly used to treat infection in patients who are seriously ill. Currently, beta-lactam antibiotics are most commonly given to patients as intermittent infusions (given at regular intervals) throughout 24 hours. However, giving the beta-lactam antibiotic as a continuous infusion may mean that antibiotic concentrations in the blood remain more consistent and may be more effective at killing bacteria. Previous studies in humans have not been large enough to show if there is any benefit to the patient by giving beta-lactam antibiotics this way. The purpose of this research is to explore whether beta-lactam antibiotics, commonly used in the treatment of sepsis (a life threatening complication of infection), work better when they are administered by 24 hour continuous infusion as opposed to multiple intermittent infusions each day. This study is part of an international multicentre clinical trial involving 7000 participants to answer this important clinical question. These sort of antibiotics are a vital part of our treatment for people with severe infections so it is important we know how to use them in the most effective way. All of the antibiotics used in this study (i.e. piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem) are registered drugs currently used in the treatment of sepsis. In this trial we are investigating the delivery method for these drugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>WHITE 8</title>
		<link>https://www.srmrc.nihr.ac.uk/trials/white-8/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brownda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 22:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://srmrc.nihr.ac.uk/?post_type=trial&#038;p=8968</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hip fractures are serious injuries which mostly occur in older patients. In the UK there are ~60,000 hip fractures every year and it is a potentially catastrophic event; approximately 30%...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hip fractures are serious injuries which mostly occur in older patients. In the UK there are ~60,000 hip fractures every year and it is a potentially catastrophic event; approximately 30% of patients will die during the first year following this injury and those that survive will have a significant reduction in their quality of life. The most common type of hip fracture is treated with a partial hip replacement or hemi-arthroplasty. The hemiarthroplasty can be fixed to the patient’s thigh bone with or without the use of ‘bone cement’, however a high percentage of these are fixed with cement. When fixing a broken hip with hemi-arthroplasty, a small percentage of patients experience Surgical Site Infection (SSI), a potentially catastrophic post-operative complication. In order to reduce the risk of infection, patients are given antibiotics. Antibiotics can also be added to the bone cement to help reduce the risk of infection. This trial aims to compare two different antibiotic-loaded bone cement mixtures used to hold a hemi-arthroplasty implant in place. The results of this trial should tell us if there is any difference in the rate of deep infection in patients when one of the two bone cement mixtures is used to hold their hemi-arthroplasty implant in place. The information gained will help patients and their doctors make more informed decisions about the best way to reduce the risk of infection in this type of surgery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>WHiTE 5</title>
		<link>https://www.srmrc.nihr.ac.uk/trials/white-5/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brownda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 22:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://srmrc.nihr.ac.uk/?post_type=trial&#038;p=8966</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A hip fracture is a serious injury which mostly occurs in older patients. In the UK there are ~60,000 hip fractures every year. A hip fracture is a potentially catastrophic...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A hip fracture is a serious injury which mostly occurs in older patients. In the UK there are ~60,000 hip fractures every year. A hip fracture is a potentially catastrophic event; approximately 30% of patients will die during the first year following this injury and those that survive will have a significant reduction in their quality of life. The most common type of hip fracture is treated with a partial hip replacement. The implant can be fixed to the patient’s thigh bone with or without the use of ‘bone cement’. Cement is the current standard technique, but there are some risks with this which could be avoided by using ‘uncemented’ implants. These risks, which include an increase in mortality during the first 24 hours after surgery, have prompted an alert from the National Patient Safety Agency. Historically, the outcomes with early uncemented implants were shown to be inferior to the cemented implants currently used, and this has been the justification for the ongoing use of cement. However, since these studies were done, there have been significant improvements in uncemented implant technology and the current, although limited, evidence suggests that these modern uncemented implants may be as good as the cemented implants but without the risks of using cement. This study will be a randomised controlled trial in 1128 participants that will answer the question of whether outcomes with modern uncemented stems are comparable to the cemented stems currently used in the majority of UK centres. Eligible patients will be aged 60 years and over who have sustained a hip fracture which is suitable for a hemiarthroplasty. We will include participants with cognitive impairment. After consent or consultee agreement, participants will be randomised to receive either a modern, uncemented implant or a cemented implant. In this study, the distribution of quality of life scores will be assessed, along with details of participants’ mobility and residential status. The demographic and treatment details along with pre-injury quality of life will be assessed at baseline, and quality of life will be assessed again 1-month and 4-months after the injury.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>WHiTE</title>
		<link>https://www.srmrc.nihr.ac.uk/trials/white/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brownda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 22:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://srmrc.nihr.ac.uk/?post_type=trial&#038;p=8964</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Update August 2021 &#8211; WHiTE has now closed to recruitment at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Hip fractures are one of the commonest osteoporotic fractures in the UK and are the...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Update August 2021</strong> &#8211; WHiTE has now closed to recruitment at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital</p>
<p>Hip fractures are one of the commonest osteoporotic fractures in the UK and are the single greatest healthcare burden in this country. They cause considerable ill-health and death for many people. As a consequence of the importance of this injury, the NHS has set up the National Hip Fracture Database to help determine how well the NHS treats patients with a hip fracture and to try to improve this service. This study aims to record important additional patient-centred outcomes of treatment. Using this information, we aim to be able to test new treatments that may in the future improve our treatment of patients with a hip fracture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>TTM2</title>
		<link>https://www.srmrc.nihr.ac.uk/trials/ttm2/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brownda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 22:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://srmrc.nihr.ac.uk/?post_type=trial&#038;p=8962</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Around 300,000 Europeans suffer an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) each year. Around 20% achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and are usually unconscious, requiring admission to intensive care where ~50%...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Around 300,000 Europeans suffer an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) each year. Around 20% achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and are usually unconscious, requiring admission to intensive care where ~50% are discharged alive. Many interventions have been investigated to lower mortality and improve neurologic function but to date, induced hypothermia is the only intervention that has shown promising results in preliminary clinical trials. The Target Temperature Management after OHCA 2 (TTM2) trial is a continuation of the collaboration that resulted in the previous Target Temperature Management after OHCA (TTM1). The TTM1 trial (NCT01020916) was a multicentre, multinational, outcome assessor-blinded, parallel group, randomised clinical trial comparing two strict target temperature regimens of 33°C and 36°C in adult patients, who had sustained ROSC and were unconscious after OHCA, when admitted to hospital. The trial did not demonstrate any difference in survival or neurologic function at 6 months after the arrest. This planned trial is an international, multicentre, parallel group, randomised, superiority trial in which a target temperature of 33°C after cardiac arrest will be compared to normothermia with early treatment of fever (&gt;37.8°C), as the latter is associated with worse outcomes. Patients eligible for inclusion will be unconscious adult patients with OHCA of a presumed cardiac cause with stable ROSC. The intervention period will commence at the time of randomisation. Rapid cooling in the hypothermia group will be achieved by means of cold fluids and state-of-the-art cooling devices. In the normothermia arm the aim will be early treatment of fever (&gt;37.8°C) when needed. All participants will be sedated, mechanically ventilated throughout the intervention period of 40 hours. Participants remaining unconscious will be assessed according to European Resuscitation Council’s recommendations for neurological prognostication after cardiac arrest. Follow-up will be performed at 30 days, 6 and 24 months after cardiac arrest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>TraumaBank</title>
		<link>https://www.srmrc.nihr.ac.uk/trials/traumabank/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brownda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 22:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://srmrc.nihr.ac.uk/?post_type=trial&#038;p=8961</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[N/A]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>N/A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>TAME</title>
		<link>https://www.srmrc.nihr.ac.uk/trials/tame/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brownda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 22:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://srmrc.nihr.ac.uk/?post_type=trial&#038;p=8959</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Update August 2021 &#8211; TAME has now closed to recruitment at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Cardiac arrest is a common and catastrophic event with substantial human and financial costs. It...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Update August 2021</strong> &#8211; TAME has now closed to recruitment at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital</p>
<p>Cardiac arrest is a common and catastrophic event with substantial human and financial costs. It is well established that cardiac arrest leads to brain injury. However, what is not widely appreciated is that, after circulation has been restored, cerebral (brain) hypoperfusion (inadequate blood supply) continues. Ongoing cerebral vasoconstriction (blood vessel constriction) and cerebral hypoxia (inadequate oxygen) has been demonstrated using imaging and metabolic technologies including positron emission tomography, ultrasound, jugular bulb oxygen saturation and cerebral oximetry. A likely mechanism responsible for sustained early cerebral hypoperfusion relates to impaired cerebrovascular autoregulation which is the ability of the brain to maintain its own perfusion. Impaired cerebral auto-regulation may make even a normal arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO<sub>2</sub>) (the major physiological regulator of cerebral blood flow) insufficient to achieve and maintain adequate cerebral perfusion and, consequently, cerebral oxygenation. PaCO<sub>2</sub> is the major determinant of cerebral blood flow and an increased PaCO<sub>2</sub> (hypercapnia) markedly increases cerebral blood flow. Arterial carbon dioxide is modifiable and, as such, is a potential therapeutic target. The TAME Cardiac Arrest Trial is a phase III, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial in resuscitated cardiac arrest patients. This trial will determine whether targeted therapeutic mild hypercapnia (TTMH) applied during the first 24 hours of mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit improves neurological outcome at 6 months compared to standard care (targeted normocapnia (TN). Supported by compelling preliminary data, significant improvements in patient outcomes are achievable with this simple and cost-free therapy. Recruiting 1,700 patients, for multiple sites in many countries, this will be one of the largest trial ever conducted involving resuscitated cardiac arrest patients admitted to ICU. If the TAME Cardiac Arrest Trial confirms that TTMH is effective, its findings will improve the lives of many patients, transform clinical practice and yield major economic gains worldwide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SUBMIT</title>
		<link>https://www.srmrc.nihr.ac.uk/trials/submit/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brownda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 22:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://srmrc.nihr.ac.uk/?post_type=trial&#038;p=8958</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Metacarpal fractures are common, accounting for 40% of all hand injuries and many can be treated non-operatively. However, surgery is reserved for cases in which an adequate reduction of both...]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Metacarpal fractures are common, accounting for 40% of all hand injuries and many can be treated non-operatively. However, surgery is reserved for cases in which an adequate reduction of both angular and rotational deformity cannot be maintained or where an adjacent ray is damaged. Varieties of surgical strategies exist, including percutaneous Kirschner wiring, intramedullary fixation, and fixation with plate and screw construction. A plate secured along the dorsal midline of the metacarpal has been shown to be the best biomechanical method of fixation, and allows early aggressive hand therapy post-operatively. Traditionally, bicortical fixation is the standard practice, where both dorsal and palmar cortices of the metacarpal are drilled though. However, such practice is not without risk. In this method, the flexor tendons and neurovascular bundles at risk from over-zealous drilling through the palmar cortice. Correct screw size selection is also critical as overly long screws can irritate and cause rupture of flexor tendon. More recently, with the advent of a new generation of locking plates, unicortical fixation, where only the near cortex is drilled, has been used to treat fractures. Unicortical fixation is a surgically less complex operation, can theoretically cause less damage to surrounding soft tissues and avoids the complications associated with incorrectly sized screws. This trial aims to compares the functional outcomes and complications of patients having unicortical versus bicortical fixation for diaphyseal metacarpal fractures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
